Turkish Teachers' Opinions on the Measurement and Evaluation Approach of the 2024 Secondary School Turkish Course Curriculum (5, 6, 7 and 8th Grade)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15680687Keywords:
Education model, Turkish curriculum, measurement and evaluation, phenomenologyAbstract
Study evaluates 2024 Secondary School Turkish Curriculum from the perspective of Turkish teachers in terms of measurement and evaluation. It discusses the program's main components, objectives, content, skill-oriented approach, and applicability. Research was designed according to a phenomenological qualitative research method, and data were collected via semi-structured interviews with 21 teachers who had experience with new curriculum and at least five years of professional experience. Based on the teachers' opinions obtained from the findings, strengths and areas for improvement of 2024 Secondary School Turkish Curriculum were identified. Specifically, we analyzed adequacy of activities for developing language skills, assessment, evaluation processes, timeliness of the course content, and program's suitability for students' needs. Findings reveal that, while teachers generally view program positively, they face difficulties in implementation. Teachers emphasized that content should be more flexible, teaching materials should be more diverse, program should include more student-centered practices. Additionally, they stated that measurement and evaluation processes should be more objective and functional. To increase program's success, it’s suggested that in-service training for teachers be organized and that feedback mechanisms be strengthened during implementation. Study is an important resource for evaluating program's applicability in the field and can contribute to development of educational policies.
References
Ağaoğlu, A., & Bavlı, B. (2023). Teaching English as a foreign language: Technology integration in testing and assessment. e-Uluslararası Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 14(1), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.19160/e-ijer.1124944
Baltacı, A. (2018). Nitel araştırmalarda örnekleme yöntemleri ve örnek hacmi sorunsalı üzerine kavramsal bir inceleme. Bitlis Eren Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 7(1), 231-274.
Benli, İ., & İsmailova, R. (2018). Use of open-ended questions in measurement and evaluation methods in distance education. International Technology and Education Journal, 2(1), 1-8.
Creswell, J. W. (2022). A concise introduction to mixed methods research. SAGE Publications.
Demir, S. B., & Yıldırım, Ö. (2022). Inside the black box: Do teachers practice assessment as learning? International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, 9(Özel Sayı), 46-71. https://doi.org/10.21449/ijate.1132923
Gungenci, M. M., & Yıldız, M. (2024). Challenges in listening and speaking skills for Arabic language pre-service teachers: A correlational study. Research on Youth and Language, 18(2), 104-116.
Gülden, B., & Kaplan, K. (2023). Türkçe öğretmenlerinin öğretmenlik kariyer basamaklarında yükselme yönetmeliği ile ilgili görüşleri. Korkut Ata Türkiyat Araştırmaları Dergisi, 10, 14-31. https://doi.org/10.51531/korkutataturkiyat.1251782
Hurst, C. (2011). Formative assessment: Tertiary student perceptions. AARE 2011. Hobart: Curtin University.
Kaplan, K., & Gülden, B. (2024). Türkçe ders kitaplarında ölçme ve değerlendirme. M. Memiş içinde, Türkçe ders kitabı inceleme kılavuzu (s. 583-613). Nobel Akademik.
Kaplan, K., & Gülden, B. (2025). Türkçe öğretmenlerinin millî eğitim bakanlığı ölçme ve değerlendirme yönetmeliğindeki değişikliklere yönelik görüşleri. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Buca Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 63, 61-80. https://doi.org/10.53444/deubefd.1433748
Kıral, B. (2021). Nitel araştırmada fenomenoloji deseni: Türleri ve araştırma süreci. Journal of Research in Education and Teaching, 10(4), 92-103.
MEB. (2024). Ortaokul Türkçe dersi öğretim programı.
MEB. (2024). Türkiye Yüzyılı Maarif Modeli Öğretim Programları Ortak Metni. Millî Eğitim Bakanlığı.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Sage Publications.
Öktem, Ü. (2005). Fenomenoloji ve Edmund Husserl'de apaçıklık Evidenz problemi. Ankara Üniversitesi Dil ve Tarih-Coğrafya Fakültesi Dergisi, 45(1), 27-55.
Polat, M. (2020). Analysis of multiple-choice versus open-ended questions in language tests according to different cognitive domain levels. Novitas-Royal. DO. Research on Youth and Language, 14(2), 76-96.
Shabaan, A. M., Naggar, Z. A., & Nassar, R. F. (2012). The effectiveness of a suggested comprehensive assessment-based program in enhancing primary stage students listening skills. Almandumah, 188, 1-14.
Sönmez, M., Topçam, A. B., Durmaz, M., & Çetinkaya, F. Ç. (2023). Developing reading and listening skills of an inclusion student: An action research. Sakarya University Journal of Education, 24-47.
Tekin, H. (2014). Eğitimde ölçme ve değerlendirme. Yargı Yayınevi.
Toker, T., ve Yılmaz, E. O. (2022). Analysing the effects of assessment and evaluation applications and exam formats in distance education. International Journal of Psychology and Educational Studies, 9(1), 165-176.
Turgut, M. F., ve Baykul, Y. (2021). Eğitimde ölçme ve değerlendirme. Pegem Akademi Yayıncılık.
Yıldırım, A., ve Şimşek, H. (2021). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri. Seçkin Yayıncılık.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of Curriculum and Educational Studies

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
